Skip to main content
HOME   |   ABOUT   |   NEWS   |   TECH ARTICLES   |   AT THE TRACK   |   REVIEWS   |   VIDEOS   |   CONTACT ME

The Power Wars Recap - 707 hp Challenger, Mid engine Corvette, AWD 300 hp Focus RS and more

Well, I have unfortunately found myself too busy to write once again for the last few weeks. Typically, whenever I don't write for a while (regardless of length) I overlook the period that I missed. Not this time though. Some announcements that were made in the last few weeks are so significant that it would be wrong for a driver's blog to exclude them so here's a quick rundown of what I think are the biggest announcements, starting with the obvious one..




Dodge Challenger SRT Hellcat: It blew expectations on many levels. Dodge allowed it to make more hp than the Viper which many said it wouldn't. It allowed it to crest the 700 hp mark, 707 hp on tap to be exact. It comes with a full warranty, looks absolutely menacing and MSRP is just under $60,000, much lower than anyone expected. It's a HEMI. It's supercharged. It makes more than 700 hp and it has a warranty. The rest are just details. Yes, it's not particularly happy at the track but whoever expected it to be was just delusional and it handles great for its size and main purpose. It's a big bruiser and I love it.




Dodge Charger SRT8 Hellcat: Take all the above and turn the awesome factor a few notches, with the same drivetrain and power but double the door count. If only Dodge offered this with a manual..




Chevrolet Corvette Stingray Z06: There are huge expectations for this car and I do not expect it to disappoint one bit. The (very pleasantly) surprising detail about it as that, despite making 650 hp which is more hp than the outgoing ZR1 and being expect it to match or beat all performance metrics, base price gets only a slight (relatively) bump to $78,995, keeping it under $80,000. This will put many cars on notice, as did the last Z06 and ZR1.

Mid-engine Corvette: There has been many rumours about mid-engine Corvettes over the years but, according to Motor Trend, this one will stick. A mid-engine Corvette is confirmed and coming so all we have to do is wait. The best thing is, it won't replace the traditional Corvette which will turn the Corvette nameplate into a sub line-up with front and mid engine options. There's something special about front-engine RWD layout in my opinion so I'm very happy that the traditional layout isn't going anywhere. However, a mid-engine layout will give the car much needed traction and stability to compete in the near-1,000 hp class and being a Corvette fan, that's always good. I would imaging there will be at least two models, one to replace the outgoing ZR1 and be one step up from the upcoming C7 Z06 and another to compete with hypercars in the 800-1,000 hp range. I'll certainly be looking forward to more details.

AWD Ford Focus RS: According to many sources, the next Focus RS will finally get an AWD drivetrain and have up to 350 hp. The best part about it is that it is likely to land on this side of the pond. With the next Dart SRT confirmed to be AWD, the Mitsubishi Lancer EVO and Subaru WRX and WRX STi will finally have domestic competition not from one, but two manufacturers (are you listening Chevrolet?). There has already been spy-shots of it testing so details should start rolling out soon.




Dodge Viper SRT: While I think the slow sales are a factor in dropping the price, I wouldn't be surprised at all if it really isn't the main reason. The main reason is probably the announced price of the new Corvette Z06. I really hope they aren't concerned about the slow sales and the future of the Viper isn't in jeopardy. I know if I had a $100k to spend on a car, I wouldn't easily go to the Z06 simply because the undeniable attitude of the Viper (and it isn't like the Viper is slow by any stretch of the imagination). If I had $200k to spend, I wouldn't hesitate about buying one of each.

Comments







Does An Aftermarket Grille Really Increase Airflow?
I put a Saleen S281 grille to the test to answer that question.

Stock Suspension S197 Mustang With Square 305/30/19's
What you need to fit a proper size square tire setup.

How Limited Slip Diffs Make You Faster on Track
What you need to know about how they put power down and pros and cons.

Can Telemetry Explain Schumacher's Talent?
A comparison between Schumacher's and then team mate Herbert's data.






Cayman GT4 Track Review
The first Cayman with proper (911-challenging) power.

Is an EcoBoost Mustang any good on Track?
Two days at the track in a Mustang short 4 cylinders.

2016 BMW M4 DCT Track Review
It's quick (properly quick). But is it fun?

Can a stock Golf Diesel handle a Track Day?
Not your every day track beater.




🔥 Most Visited This Week

Michelin Pilot Super Sports vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 - Street Review

I've been a huge fan of Michelin PSS tires and exclusively bought them for the Mustang over the last four years. So how did I end up here? This year, I was hugely interested in trying an "R-comp" tire. I had my eyes set on Bridgestone Potenza RE-71R's for two simple reasons: price and reputation. Although not a true "R-comp" tire on paper, it performs like one by the account of every single test and review I've read (down to wear rates...). They seem like they're easily the most affordable (from a big brand) R-comp tire and combine that with a reputation for having tons of grip, it was an easy top contender. I had my concerns, though. For one, I'm told and have read that they are an autox tire, not really designed for high speed, pressure, and temps associated with open track. For another, the Mustang is a heavy car (as far as track cars are concerned) being roughly 3,800 lb. (including driver), which will amplify the unwanted open track load

GTR vs Evo X vs STI: which has the best AWD system?

A few weeks ago, I made a post explaining  mainstream AWD system types and how they compare , pros and cons, etc. including some simple diagrams to show where the power goes and how much. As promised, this post will focus on specific cars and what AWD systems they use, especially ones that that have more or less been defined by their AWD systems, and the best place to start may be with a bombshell; the Nissan GT-R. Nissan GT-R (R35) The GT-R has built a reputation around having monster traction and very approachable performance, thanks to its AWD system - Advanced Total Traction Engineering System for All-Terrain (ATTESA) - and what it can do for you. But the GT-R doesn't actually use the most mechanically sophisticated type of AWD systems discussed in the previous article, namely a "true" AWD with a centre differential. Instead, it uses a clutch pack to transfer power. RWD-based clutch-type AWD schematic - Rams Eye The Track Guy © The R32, R33, and R34 Sky

Falken Azenis RT615k+ Street and Track Review

Last year, I picked up a 2009 Lancer Ralliart to do a long term test with it as a dual duty track/daily. One of the first things I knew I was going to do was put a decent set of tires on it. The car came without OEM wheels which was actually good because I didn't have to hesitate about getting a good set of aftermarket wheels to support going wider. Thankfully, my friends at YST Auto Halifax  set me up with a great set of Superspeed RF03RR wheels. The Wheels I had never even heard of Superspeed but I trusted the good folk at YST Auto who mentioned some customer cars running on track with them. These wheels are rotary forged which is basically a prerequisite to be taken seriously in this market populated by companies like TSW and Fast Wheels. The wheels looked like a high quality, well finished wheel and each had a "QC" check sticker on. Just for appearances? Maybe, but I found no defects. The wheels seemed easy to balance (didn't need many weights) and at 18.1 lb. f

2004 Audi TT 3.2 Quattro DSG Track Review

Before getting into this, I have to confess something... I had never driven an Audi TT before. Not until this one, anyway. But that hasn't stopped me from forming an opinion about it from the comforts of my own couch while reading and watching reviews online. After all, if you've never done that, do you even know what the point of the internet is? Now, we all interpret reviews differently. Call it confirmation bias if you will, but if you like a car, you'll read a review and look at the positives as what makes the car great and the negatives are but a few quibbles you have to live with. If you don't like a car, the positives are a few things the manufacturer got right while screwing up everything else. It's a bit harsh to put the TT in the latter category, but that's where it ended up for me... I never took the TT seriously. The problem with the TT for me isn't that it's a Golf underneath, per se. There is nothing wrong with a performance car sharing a